Quantcast

Valgrind: r16217 - in /trunk/memcheck/tests: leak_cpp_interior.cpp leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit-solaris leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-solaris

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Valgrind: r16217 - in /trunk/memcheck/tests: leak_cpp_interior.cpp leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit-solaris leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-solaris

svn-2
Author: petarj
Date: Tue Jan 31 18:22:20 2017
New Revision: 16217

Log:
force old implementation of std::string for leak_cpp_interior test

This patch forces leak_cpp_interior to be compiled using old implementation
of std::string.

Related issue #373069

Patch by Aleksandar Rikalo.

Modified:
    trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.cpp
    trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp
    trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit
    trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit-solaris
    trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-solaris

Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.cpp
==============================================================================
--- trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.cpp (original)
+++ trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.cpp Tue Jan 31 18:22:20 2017
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+#define _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0
 #define __STDC_FORMAT_MACROS
 #include <inttypes.h>
 #include <stdio.h>

Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp
==============================================================================
--- trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp (original)
+++ trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp Tue Jan 31 18:22:20 2017
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 valgrind output will go to log
 VALGRIND_DO_LEAK_CHECK
 4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
-   by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:115)
-   by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:130)
+   by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:116)
+   by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:131)
 
 LEAK SUMMARY:
    definitely lost: 4 bytes in 1 blocks

Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit
==============================================================================
--- trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit (original)
+++ trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit Tue Jan 31 18:22:20 2017
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 valgrind output will go to log
 VALGRIND_DO_LEAK_CHECK
 8 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
-   by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:115)
-   by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:130)
+   by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:116)
+   by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:131)
 
 LEAK SUMMARY:
    definitely lost: 8 bytes in 1 blocks

Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit-solaris
==============================================================================
--- trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit-solaris (original)
+++ trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit-solaris Tue Jan 31 18:22:20 2017
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 valgrind output will go to log
 VALGRIND_DO_LEAK_CHECK
 8 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
-   by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:115)
-   by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:130)
+   by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:116)
+   by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:131)
 
 LEAK SUMMARY:
    definitely lost: 8 bytes in 1 blocks

Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-solaris
==============================================================================
--- trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-solaris (original)
+++ trunk/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-solaris Tue Jan 31 18:22:20 2017
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 valgrind output will go to log
 VALGRIND_DO_LEAK_CHECK
 4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
-   by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:115)
-   by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:130)
+   by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:116)
+   by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:131)
 
 LEAK SUMMARY:
    definitely lost: 4 bytes in 1 blocks


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Valgrind-developers mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers
Loading...